The Department for Transport has slammed what it calls “misleading figures” on transport investment in northern England, following claims by think tank IPPR North that London is set to receive 2.9 times more transport investment.
The Government’s own statistics in its investment pipeline claim that the North West receives £333 transport spending per head, marginally higher than the South East (£329) and far ahead of London’s figure of £183. The statistics also suggest Yorkshire and the Humber receive £180 per capita and the North East £154.
However, IPPR’s analysis suggests that from 2018-19 onwards, planned central and local public/private transport infrastructure expenditure on committed projects is £3,636 per head in London but an average of £1,247 in the North.
IPPR North goes on to say that government analysis of planned spending is incomplete and that it makes two assumptions that IPPR North believes are flawed.
The first is that government figures exclude spending beyond 2021. IPPR North points out that the Government says it should only analyse projects within the spending review period (which ends in 2020-21), but believes this is flawed because the purpose of the investment pipeline is to set out long-term investment plans.
Secondly, the government analysis excludes £9.9 billion worth of expenditure in London, even though IPPR North argues that this is central government’s responsibility.
“We’re aware the government response to these figures may well be to challenge some of the assumptions we have made, but we stand by these assumptions and urge the government to be more transparent and consistent. This pattern of spending cannot be justified - despite many efforts to do so,” the report says.
In response, a DfT spokesman told RAlL: “We do not recognise these misleading figures - we’re spending more on transport per person in the North than anywhere else."
- For the FULL story, read RAIL 886, published on August 28, and available digitally on Android, iPad and Kindle from August 24.
Comment as guest
Comments
No comments have been made yet.